This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
45 degree connections
02-09-2025, 06:41 AM, (This post was last modified: 02-09-2025, 06:48 AM by shaswin.)
#4
RE: 45 degree connections
@Bas: There is an updated version document for modelling tees in Ple4Win: rev. 11 dated 01-08-2015. See attachment in this message.


For Y-pieces a workaround can be done like this, I think:

SXUB1=i_combined=SQRT((i_inplane*COS(PHI_MB))^2+(i_outplane*SIN(PHI_MB))^2). The i_inplane and i_outplane are from a normal tee (90 degrees) calculation.

Is it possible to implement this weighing factor by default in Ple4Win when there are branching connects in the system with an T-angle which is not 90 degrees?

I think then that the weakened parts of the pipe at the connects are taken correctly into account in the stress calculations.

Also the hole in the connect which can be oval (depends on the connecting angle) should be taken into account in the ovalisation and redistribution calculation.


Attached Files
.pdf   Modelling of tees in Ple4Win.pdf (Size: 384,01 KB / Downloads: 2)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
45 degree connections - by peipei - 22-12-2011, 11:52 AM
RE: 45 degree connections - by Bas - 10-05-2016, 12:39 AM
RE: 45 degree connections - by shaswin - 02-09-2025, 06:41 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)